Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a lot better than the Moto G Fast's score of 72.2. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Although Motorola razr (2020) and the Moto G Fast were released only a couple of months apart, Motorola razr (2020)'s design is somewhat thinner but also a little bit heavier than the Moto G Fast.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 876 x 2142px and a better pixel count in each display inch. The Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto G Fast features a way better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better videos and photos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same camera aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a way bigger sensor.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Fast. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Fast, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.