Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 268 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, getting a global score of 79.2 against 72.2. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a noticeably newer and a lot thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Fast, although it's also just a little bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has newer 15 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11.
The Moto G Fast features a much greater processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Moto G Fast features a way better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a camera with lot more MP.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with improved battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.