Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Pearl white | Meteor grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an overall score of 80.3, which is much better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has 10 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is just a bit thinner but heavier than Moto G Fast, and both of them were released with only 5 months difference.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a little bigger display, a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with better video frame rate, a back camera with way more MP and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 32 GB more internal storage. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a little better battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Fast. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G Fast, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.