Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. The Nokia 9 PureView design is thinner and a little lighter than the Moto G Fast, despite of the fact that it was released only 16 months before. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit superior processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia 9 PureView also has more RAM.
Nokia 9 PureView features a much more vibrant display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a lot higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G Fast shoots a bit better videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video definition, a 0.36 inches back camera sensor and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Nokia 9 PureView features a little bit better memory to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Fast counts with greater battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 20 percent more battery size.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Nokia 9 PureView, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Fast, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.