Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Pearl white | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is better than Moto G Fast's general score of 72.2. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should provide the same operating system features. The Nokia XR20 is a newer cellphone than Moto G Fast, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
Nokia XR20 features a better looking display than Moto G Fast, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher count of pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia XR20 also has more RAM memory.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has more internal storage capacity. The Nokia XR20 has a little better battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 16% greater battery size.
Nokia XR20 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality pictures and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Nokia XR20, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Fast, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.