Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Pearl white | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. The nubia Red Magic 3S design is heavier and a little bit thicker than Moto G Fast. These devices work with Android operating system, but the nubia Red Magic 3S has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Fast has Android 11, counting with a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a higher pixels quantity per display inch, a little bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better 48 MP resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs and a way better video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features better battery performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G Fast, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.