Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Pearl white | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a global score of 76.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 5S has 10 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. Although the nubia Red Magic 5S is better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, it must be noted that it is also a somewhat heavier and a little thicker cellphone.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a brighter display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a greater pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a slightly better memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes way better photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Fast, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.