Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Pearl white | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 is better than Moto G Fast, having a overall score of 79.7 against 72.2. These phones work with Android operating system, but OPPO Find X2 has 10 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. OPPO Find X2's body is thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G Fast, even when both were released with only a couple of months difference.
The OPPO Find X2 has a much better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a quite bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. The OPPO Find X2 features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 counts with a much better camera than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X2 also has higher video frame rate, a much larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with much more MP.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.