Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Pearl white | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 overall score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X2 Pro has the older 10 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. The OPPO Find X2 Pro design is a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than the Moto G Fast, and both were released with only a few months difference.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a much better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a much higher screen pixels density and a bit larger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot better camera than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, faster video frame rate and a camera with a much better resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.