Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is a little bit better than the Moto G Fast, with a overall score of 77.4 against 72.2. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a more recent 14 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's body is incredibly newer and a little thinner, but a bit heavier than Moto G Fast.
The Moto G Fast counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has 1 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a greater amount of pixels per inch of display, a way better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A15 5G shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A15 5G has superior battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G costs the same than the Moto G Fast, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.