Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A16 5G has a score of 76.2, which is a bit better than the Moto G Fast's score of 72.2. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A16 5G has a newer 14 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. Galaxy A16 5G's design is a little heavier but thinner than the Moto G Fast. The Motorola Moto G Fast features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with a better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a greater screen density, a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture. The Galaxy A16 5G has greater battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.