Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 268 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A20s is a bit better than the Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 77 against 72.2. Although the Galaxy A20s and the Moto G Fast were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A20s is somewhat thinner and a little lighter. These phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The Moto G Fast features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A20s, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A20s and Moto G Fast count with similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A20s has a just a bit lower screen density, and they both have an equal 720 x 1560 resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Moto G Fast shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a more MP back facing camera. Galaxy A20s counts with a better storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A20s also has 64 GB internal storage.
Moto G Fast and Galaxy A20s both count with similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.