Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A21 is a bit better than Moto G Fast, getting a 76.1 score against 72.2. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A21 has 10 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. The Galaxy A21 design is thinner but just a little bit heavier than Moto G Fast, and they were released with only a couple months difference.
Samsung Galaxy A21 has a bit better processor than Moto G Fast. They have the same number of cores and a 3 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A21 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a little higher resolution of 720 x 1600px, a little bit larger screen and a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto G Fast and Galaxy A21 count with really similar storage for applications and games, both of them have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A21 has a battery duration that's just as good as the battery life in Motorola Moto G Fast.
Moto G Fast shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 16 mega pixels resolution, the Moto G Fast also has a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A21 is also the cheapest one, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.