Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 is a bit better than Moto G Fast, getting a 76.1 score against 72.2. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A22 has a more recent 12 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. The Galaxy A22 is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto G Fast.
The Galaxy A22's processing unit is just as good as the Moto G Fast one, and although the Galaxy A22 has 1 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy A22 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a just a bit higher pixel amount per inch of screen and a quite better 720 x 1600 resolution.
Moto G Fast counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Galaxy A22 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Moto G Fast counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.