Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is much better than Moto G Fast, having a global score of 84.6 against 72.2. Galaxy A22 5G is a newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Moto G Fast, although it's also a bit heavier. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Galaxy A22 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a brighter display than Moto G Fast, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite bigger screen and a greater display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a little bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G features superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.