Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Pearl white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, having a 79.9 score against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a notably newer and a little bit thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G Fast, although it is a little bit heavier.
The Moto G Fast has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A25 5G has a much sharper display than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit larger screen and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A25 5G takes better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A25 5G has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with improved battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.