Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 has a score of 79.6, which is much better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. Galaxy A30 is an older cellphone than Moto G Fast, but Samsung could make it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The Moto G Fast features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A30, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A30 also has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much better pixel number per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A30 has a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A30 also has 64 GB internal memory.
The Moto G Fast counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a 0.36 inches camera sensor and the same aperture, the Moto G Fast also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Galaxy A30 has a battery performance that's just as good as Motorola Moto G Fast's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.