Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Pearl white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30s is better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, having a overall score of 79.8 against 72.2. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy A30s is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G Fast, even though both of them were released with only 9 months difference.
The Moto G Fast and the Samsung Galaxy A30s both count with really similar screens, both have the same exact resolution of 720 x 1560, a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a display of the same size. Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A30s, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A30s features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A30s also has 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A30s's battery duration is just as good as Moto G Fast's battery duration.
The Moto G Fast has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a much worse 16 MP resolution camera, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Moto G Fast also counts with a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.