Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a global score of 82, which is better than the Moto G Fast's general score of 72.2. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a just a little bit thinner and notably lighter phone than Moto G Fast, although they were released with only 9 months difference. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Moto G Fast and the Galaxy A32 LTE Only count with similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 1 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a much greater screen pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a much tinier sensor which provides a way lower photo and video quality and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with superior battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.