Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A33 5G has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A33 5G has a newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. Galaxy A33 5G is a newer phone, and it is also a little lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G Fast.
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A33 5G, although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G also has a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way better pixels amount per inch of screen.
The Motorola Moto G Fast captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations. Galaxy A33 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A33 5G has superior battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.