Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is better than Moto G Fast, with a global score of 82.9 against 72.2. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A34 has the newer 13 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, giving you some extra features. The Galaxy A34 is a incredibly lighter and notably thinner phone than Moto G Fast.
Galaxy A34 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A34 also has more RAM. The Galaxy A34 has a brighter display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher pixel amount in each display inch and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Moto G Fast features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A34, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A34 counts with superior battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G Fast takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution and a much smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.