Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has a general score of 79.4, which is slightly better than the Moto G Fast's general score of 72.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A35 5G has a more recent 14 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, so it provides you some extra features and performance optimizations. Even though Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit heavier than the Moto G Fast, it's somewhat thinner and also extremely newer.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a better count of pixels per inch of screen, a quite bigger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Moto G Fast features a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A35 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy A35 5G has greater battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.