Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Pearl white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A41 is better than the Moto G Fast, having an 81.7 score against 72.2. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Although Samsung Galaxy A41 and the Moto G Fast were only released 1 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A41 is lighter and thinner.
Galaxy A41 counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the processor in Moto G Fast, and although the Galaxy A41 has 1 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A41 features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a way better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A41 has a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has 64 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A41 has a much better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor.
Moto G Fast features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.