Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) is an a lot older device than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Galaxy A5 (2017) features a sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.
The Moto G Fast counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017). Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Moto G Fast counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto G Fast also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Fast has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity. Moto G Fast features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a back facing camera with a 16 MP, the Moto G Fast also has a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.