Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is better than Motorola Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A50 is older than Motorola Moto G Fast, it's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy A50 has a little bit better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A50 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a lot higher pixel amount per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A50 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, the same 1920x1080 video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The Moto G Fast and the Samsung Galaxy A50 count with really similar batteries duration.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.