Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Pearl white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than Moto G Fast, getting an 85.5 score against 72.2. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy A51 design is a bit lighter and thinner than the Moto G Fast, even when both were released only a few months apart. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a little larger display, a lot better screen pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A51 counts with a superior camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G Fast and the Samsung Galaxy A51 count with quite similar batteries.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a lot more expensive than Moto G Fast, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.