Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Pearl white | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting a 90.8 score against 72.2. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Even when the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola Moto G Fast were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little thinner and just a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G features a more vivid display than Moto G Fast, because it has a bit larger screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way greater pixels density.
Galaxy A51 5G features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 5G has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes much better photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.