Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is newer, just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G Fast. The Galaxy A52 counts with a better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite larger display and a lot better display density.
Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has 3 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A52 has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots way better photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much better resolution camera and a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.