Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Moto G Fast. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, providing the user a couple additional features.
Galaxy A52 5G has a brighter display than Moto G Fast, because it has a quite larger screen, a lot more pixels per display inch and a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. Galaxy A52 5G has a little better battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.