Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Pearl white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is way better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with a 91.1 score against 72.2. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design is newer, just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast. These devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has more RAM. The Galaxy A52s has a sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a way better screen density and a quite bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A52s takes a lot better videos and photos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A52s features a bit superior battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.