Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | -- |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) is a bit better than Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 78.7 against 72.2. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has a more recent 14 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored)'s construction is noticeably thinner and a lot lighter than the Moto G Fast.
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G Fast, because it has a little larger screen, a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Moto G Fast has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) counts with a superior camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
The Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) counts with a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) counts with greater battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.