Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 is a bit better than the Moto G Fast, getting a 75.8 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A6 is notably older than Moto G Fast, it's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy A6 has a little more vivid display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 720 x 1480px resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Moto G Fast features a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A6, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory, the Moto G Fast also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Moto G Fast has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A6. They have 8 processing cores and a 3 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G Fast takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, a same resolution camera in the back and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Motorola Moto G Fast has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A6 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.