Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) is just a bit better than Moto G Fast, getting a 75.8 score against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) design is a bit lighter and thinner than the Moto G Fast, even though it was released 4 years before. Motorola Moto G Fast has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017). They have the same number of cores and a 3 GB RAM.
Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a little sharper display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. The Moto G Fast features more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Fast also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Moto G Fast has a little better battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh. The Moto G Fast captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a camera in the back with a 16 MP resolution, the Moto G Fast also has a lot higher (4K) video definition and a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.