Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 76.9 against 72.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11. The Galaxy A70 body is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G Fast, despite of the fact that it was released around 14 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a better screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bigger display and a higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has a 13% larger battery size. The Motorola Moto G Fast shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same video quality, a same size aperture, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Fast, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.