Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Pearl white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, with an 87.5 score against 72.2. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy A71 construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast, even when they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 counts with a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bigger screen and a better pixels count per inch of display.
Galaxy A71 has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy A71 has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A71 also has 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A71 has a bit superior battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.