Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Pearl white | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than the Moto G Fast, with a score of 92.9 against 72.2. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a just a bit lighter and a bit thinner phone than the Moto G Fast, even though both were released with only 1 months difference.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 5 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a greater camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.