Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | -- |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A73 5G is better than the Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 80.5 against 72.2. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A73 5G has newer 12 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features. Galaxy A73 5G is a a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Moto G Fast.
The Motorola Moto G Fast features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A73 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a bit bigger display, more pixels per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has a very superior storage for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A73 5G features longer battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.