Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Pearl white | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is better than Motorola Moto G Fast's general score of 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) body is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G Fast, even though it was released only 19 months before. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a little bit better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A9 (2018) features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2220 and more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 96 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit better camera than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a 0.36 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.