Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C5 has a general score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C5 has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, so it gives a couple additional features and improved performance. Galaxy C5 is an notably older phone than the Moto G Fast, but it is incredibly thinner and noticeably lighter anyway.
The Moto G Fast has a bit superior processor than Galaxy C5, although it has 1 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy C5 has a much better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot higher pixels number per inch of screen.
Galaxy C5 has a little bit more memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 384 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G Fast features a little bit better camera than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 megapixels resolution, the Moto G Fast also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light environments.
The Moto G Fast features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.