Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F23 is much better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, having an 84.6 score against 72.2. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, giving some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy F23 is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit thinner and a lot lighter than Motorola Moto G Fast.
Galaxy F23 features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy F23 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2408 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch in the display and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy F23 has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy F23 features improved battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Motorola Moto G Fast has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.