Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Pearl white | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is much better than Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy F41 body is a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than Moto G Fast, and they were released only 4 months apart. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS, so they should give identical OS features.
The Galaxy F41 has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy F41 features a better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy F41 also has a lot higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy F41 captures greater pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.