Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Pearl white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a lot better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with a overall score of 88.1 against 72.2. Both phones we are comparing work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide the user identical OS features. Galaxy F62's construction is somewhat heavier and a little thicker than the Motorola Moto G Fast.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a more vivid display than Moto G Fast, because it has a higher screen density, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger display. The Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.