Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Pearl white | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is slightly better than Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 78.9 against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy M20 has 10 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. The Galaxy M20 is an older device than the Moto G Fast, but it's a little bit lighter and a little thinner anyway.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy M20 counts with a sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixels quantity per screen inch and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Fast takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a camera in the back with more megapixels, a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has 64 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with longer battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.