Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue, Brown and Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M33 has a global score of 86.3, which is much better than Moto G Fast's general score of 72.2. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M33 has a newer 12 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11, providing you a couple additional features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy M33 is a just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier device than the Moto G Fast.
Galaxy M33 has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy M33 also has 3 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M33 features a more vivid screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2408 resolution, a bit larger display and a better pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy M33 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Moto G Fast captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M33, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy M33 counts with improved battery performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.