Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than Moto G Fast's score of 72.2. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also a heavier and just a little bit thicker phone.
The Galaxy M51 has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display, a bit larger screen and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy M51 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy M51 also has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a little faster processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M51 features a way better battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy M51 has a superior camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.