Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M53 5G is just a bit better than Moto G Fast, with a score of 76.7 against 72.2. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M53 5G has 12 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11, so it offers a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy M53 5G construction is newer, thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto G Fast.
Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a better pixels quantity per inch in the display and a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has slightly more storage to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G Fast features a much better performance than Galaxy M53 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy M53 5G features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low light environments and a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a way worse image quality, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy M53 5G features improved battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.