Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Pearl white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Moto G Fast were released only 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Note 20's design is just a little heavier but also a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a higher pixels density, a quite bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations and a camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto G Fast, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.