Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is much better than Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11. Galaxy Note 3's construction is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G Fast, although it was released 7 years before.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Fast, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Galaxy Note 3 features a lot better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a better number of pixels per inch of display.
The Moto G Fast shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G Fast also has a lot larger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with more mega pixels and a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
The Moto G Fast features a little bit better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G Fast features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 costs more money than Moto G Fast, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.