Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Pearl white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is way better than Motorola Moto G Fast's score of 72.2. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but Samsung managed to build it thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy Note10 has a much better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM. The Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy Note10 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G Fast has just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G Fast, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.