Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Pearl white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 overall score. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Although the Galaxy Note10 Lite and Moto G Fast were released only 5 months apart, Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction is just a bit thinner but also a little heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a greater number of pixels per inch in the display, a little bit larger screen and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite captures a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video definition, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little longer battery life than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.